Which is better, Dawang Guangyu or Unicharm Royal Grade 1 Pampers diapers? - Comparison and evaluation

Dawang, Unicharm, and Pampers are all high-end maternal and infant brands. Some mothers will trust them. After all, the products they buy for their babies should be safe and reliable. So which one is better: Dawang Guangyu Diapers, Unicharm Royal Diapers, or First-Class Pampers Diapers?

contrast

Australia sells Aldi, Huggies, Pampers, Libero, SNUGGLER, Babylove, TOYSRU, etc., but I don't think they are good. Too narrow, too hard, poor absorption, Libero will also cause diaper rash, so frustrating. I still have my eyes on Japanese diapers. I wanted to choose Kao, but I heard that it was in the radiation zone, so it's out. I will definitely not accept the ordinary Unicharm.

(Left: Unicharm Natural Cotton, Middle: Dawang Guangyu, Right: First-class Pampers)

I was attracted by Dawang Guangyu, Unicharm Royal Natural Cotton Series and First-class Pampers, all of which sounded very stylish. But before I asked my mom to bring the bulk goods over, I still wanted to see which one was better. So, I shamelessly asked my friends to collect samples.

Unicharm Royal Natural Cotton Series Diapers

Appearance: The appearance is cute and adorable.

Thickness: The thickest of the three, with folds in the middle.

Water absorbency: My baby drinks a lot of milk, so his urine volume is also high. This Unicharm natural cotton cannot meet my baby's needs at all.

Softness: Not as soft as the King Light Feather, but better than the first-grade Pampers. But it sheds, and my baby's butt is still covered with a layer of hair after changing it.

Cut: The fit is really bad and urine leaks from all angles.

Breathability: Poor, very poor, extremely poor. The baby's butt is damp, and because it is damp, it is more sticky to the hair. When I change the butt, I wash it for a long time and carefully for fear of affecting the baby's reproductive parts.

Dawang Guangyu Series Diapers

Appearance: Very elegant, not many patterns, simple.

Thickness: Very thin, the thinnest among the three, and it is fluffy, not hard.

Water absorption: I have mentioned before that my baby has a lot of urine, and Dawang Guangyu can handle it well. The butt is clean when it is lifted up, which is good. I heard that if you press it before wearing it, the effect of absorbing urine will be better.

Softness: Very soft, and it feels even softer after absorbing some urine, hahahahaha. It is said that King Light Feather also contains rich natural vitamin E ingredients to protect the baby's little butt, so it is okay to apply less diaper cream, after all, diaper cream is not pure natural.

Cutting: All the details are very nice. The waist patch is very careful with rounded corners. The elastic bands in each part are composed of many strands, which disperses the pressure and does not risk cutting the baby. And every corner is very soft, very soft, very soft, so it has the best fit.

Breathability: This diaper has a breathable design on the outside. At first, I was worried that urine would leak out from the ventilation holes, but later it turned out that I was overthinking it. All the urine was locked in the high-molecular absorption component in the middle, so how could it leak out?

First-grade Pampers diapers

Appearance: I don’t like the style.

Thickness: Between king feather and natural cotton, not thick.

Water absorption: I don't know why, but when I changed it, I found a little red on the bottom, but it didn't feel damp to the touch. What I want to ask most is, why did the designer design three lumps? When I absorb urine, three lumps bulge out, and when I press them together, I think I gave birth to a rotten baby.

Softness: The softness is very poor. If the diaper is made thin, it will become hard (except for Da Wang Guangyu, which is soft and super comfortable).

Cut: The longest of the three, but the core is actually shorter than the King Light Feather, which results in the back half having no function other than abrading the skin.

Breathability: There are also ventilation holes designed, but why did he get a red butt?

Then I'll show you the comparison chart I changed every 2 hours:

(The picture above is reversed. Please forgive me for being stupid for three years during pregnancy.

Left: First-grade Pampers, middle: Dawang Guangyu, right: Unicharm Natural Cotton)

Some of the lost time was due to her having bowel movements, taking a bath, drinking milk, etc.

Have you noticed the first-level helper lumps and thickness issues I mentioned before after reading this?

Because the urine did not look very clear, I added a cup of water to each diaper to get a clearer look at the actual water absorption capacity and reverse osmosis problems of the three diapers.

After adding a bowl of water each:

(Left: Unicharm Natural Cotton, Middle: Dawang Guangyu, Right: First-class Pampers)

After Unicharm Natural Cotton absorbs water, it is obvious that it is not as absorbent as Dawang Guangyu and Pampers, and the water marks are obvious. Then someone will ask, is there something wrong with the water you added? Just look at the side and you will know.

(The order of the pictures above and below is the same. Top: Unicharm Natural Cotton, Middle: King Light Feather, Bottom: First-grade Pampers)

The three diapers are basically the same height after adding water, so there is no difference in the amount of water added. But why is there such a significant gap? Apart from the perspective of materials science (I am not an expert, just a mom), I found a very obvious difference. The Unicharm Natural Cotton at the top basically absorbs in one place, which is a surface-to-point absorption method. This may be caused by the uneven water absorption components inside it. The shape of the King Light Feather is basically uniform, which may be one of the reasons why my baby feels the nicest after using it. The absorption of the first-level Pampers only stays in its three thick diversion layers. You can imagine how uncomfortable it is.

Put a piece of paper to see how the reverse osmosis is?

(Left: Unicharm Natural Cotton, Middle: Dawang Guangyu, Right: First-class Pampers)

Unicharm has obvious reverse osmosis, Da Wang Guangyu has basically 0 reverse osmosis, and the first-level gang also has a lot of reverse osmosis (and its back side has the most reverse osmosis, so length is useless, the core is king).